not cold?

i don’t think i can handle any more pictures of this famous suri cruise kid. she is very cute, don’t get me wrong, but there must be something i don’t understand in her fashion. i even looked it up, am i alone in this thinking? all i could find (besides few other weather concerned loser-mommies like me) was that she is the most fashionable child out there. i am really out of it then. her celebrity parents wear warm pants, jackets and coats, and this kid is always in a dress, mostly in a short-sleeved dress, barelegged, and accompanied by a blanket. i don’t see the kid being wrapped in the blanket, the parents just carry it. maybe the parents bring it in case she gets really cold? maybe they bring it because it looks fashionable? maybe they can’t bear to cover the child in it because it is not fashionable? whatever the reason is – i don’t get it. this is not a baby, this is a toddler, why does she need a blanket to begin with? dressing the child in pants or in pantyhose is not an option for some reason (probably not stylish enough). the jackets or coats are probably not fashionable either (maybe until it snows). the child’s face appears cold to me on all her pictures. i guess that’s what it takes to earn the most fashionable child title. but it really bothers me to see this kid’s photographs.